they raise the question of evil,
and i’m telling you,
it is more complex
than they think it is.
and i’m telling you,
it is more complex
than they think it is.
why?
because one must question the questioner.
if there’s such a thing as evil,
you assume there’s such a thing as good.
if you assume there’s such a thing as good,
you assume there’s such a thing as a moral law
on the basis of which to differentiate
between good and evil.
if you assume there’s such a thing as a moral law,
you must posit a moral law giver,
but that’s whom they are trying
to disprove and not prove.
because if there’s not a moral law giver,
there’s no moral law.
if there’s no moral law,
there’s no good.
if there’s no good,
there’s no evil.
what is their question?
